To promote consistency in beta'ing the VS stories
and in fairness to the authors of those stories, we've
come up with some guidelines. If you have questions
not answered by these guidelines, please address
them to virtualseasonx@gmail.com
Attn: Beta Questions.
All typographical errors, grammatical errors in narrative,
and spelling errors should be corrected. Grammatical errors in dialog,
where they are used to "define" a character, should not be corrected.
For example, if the character is poorly educated, a young child,
or emotionally overwrought, his or her speech would probably
not be grammatically correct, and rightly so. Repetitive "Mulder's" and "Scully's" can
also be trimmed down. They do not need to call each other by
name in every sentence.
Continuity must be protected at all times.
This includes continuity with VS canon/fanon, with The X-Files
canon (prior to "Requiem",) and with the other stories
that have been written as a part of the Virtual Season series.
For example, characters that were dead in one story cannot spring
back to life in another; characters who have always be antitheitcal
to Mulder's cause cannot suddenly become his best friend without
excellent reason to do so.
The stories must be in the proper format.
This includes
being in text, divided into teaser/acts/epilogue (generally
speaking) and within the length restrictions of the Virtual
Season format, as described in the Guidelines
for Authors.
An author's style is her own. As long as the
above items
are present (e.g., proper format, length, continuity, etc) then
the work should not be corrected.
All betas are also authors. Occasionally a story
will be written in a style that we just cannot look at objectively. If you know
you have a problem with a particular author's style to the point
that you do not feel you can be objective when beta'ing that
story, let the producers know
and we will reschedule another beta for that work. We want to
both be fair to the author, and avoid taxing the artistic sensibilities
of the beta...
If, as Beta #1, you receive a story which clearly
does not follow the "Guidelines for Authors", notify the
producers at once. The story may have to be pulled from the
lineup for more work. If that happens and we need to juggle the
schedule, we'll need as much time as possible.
Keep to the time
constraints. If Real Life interferes with your
getting a story beta'ed, contact the
producers as soon as
possible so the story can be reassigned. We're on a tight
deadline, which could be made even tighter if the author does not submit it until
the due date or after.
As far as the process goes, we will receive all stories
and
send them to Beta#1 by the "Due Date" - assuming the author
has made it available by then. Beta#1 will have the majority of the responsibility
for the story, doing the first beta and catching the majority of the problems.
The corrected story, along with a list of any concerns Beta#1 has,
will then go to Beta#2, by the latest one week
prior to air date.
Beta #2 will read the story as corrected and make further
corrections if there were things notcaught by
Beta#1. She will also consider
the list of concerns of Beta#1 and decide on their merit. Is Beta#1 being too
picky,
or are there legitimate concerns? If there are legitimate concerns which
potentially affect the entire story, then Beta #2
should QUICKLY forward those
concerns to the producers. Otherwise,
Beta#2 will beta the story and send it to the
producers,
with the header - Final Version "Title". This must be done by
the Sunday prior to Air Date.
Beta#1 and Beta#2 can confer on the story, and especially on
any problems they are finding. If a Beta feels that the author
of a story should be contacted for questions or concerns (e.g., the beta has
found that the story is riddled with cliches throughout, or there are other serious
quality
problems), she should contact the producers immediately.
We'd like to avoid the Beta contacting the author directly except for very minor,
easily resolved questions.